A Little Bit of CIA in Every Tap

October 14, 2018
Occupy Democrats Parody

The following was received via a FaceBook link, and presents as originally worded with the exception of some minor formatting and the addition of a few related images.

By Kevin Hay

Have you ever wondered what your drinking water travels through before it reaches your tap?

It is time to do more than wonder.

It is also time to do more than wonder about the people that have been chosen to represent YOU and your children.

Your future is now at stake, simply because the people, the politicians, most of them are lawyers, trained liars and manipulators of fact.

Now, we need to separate fact from fiction.

It is time to put the talking stick down, close our mouths, and start observing the reactions to the cognitive dissonance that we have been using as an education system.
It is time that we question those who represent the media and what their true intentions are, seeing as so many of these “trusted and credible” sources are government agents working for clandestine services, agencies like the CIA.

The recently released “Pastor”, named Andrew Brunson, the person recently released from a Turkish prison, is a Central Intelligence Agency employee.
So is Anderson Cooper and many other so called news reporters.
Anderson INTERNED AT THE CIA.

FB_IMG_1478007469453 fakenews cnn anderson cooper

After enrolling at Yale University, Cooper noticed a flyer hanging in the school’s career counseling office inviting students to explore their options with the CIA. He decided to spend his summers interning at the headquarters of the agency in Langley, Virginia. Cooper later called the work “pretty bureaucratic” and “mundane” and decided not to pursue intelligence work as a profession.  Yeah..right.
That’s what everyone says when they join the CIA through the blood fraternities at Yale.

https://www.collective-evolution.com/…/cnns-primary-news-a…/

https://www.cia.gov/library/readingroom/…/DOC_0005524009.pdf

The CIA’s Operation MOCKINGBIRD is a long-recognized keystone among researchers pointing to the Agency’s clear interest in and relationship to major US news media. MOCKINGBIRD grew out of the CIA’s forerunner, the Office for Strategic Services (OSS, 1942-47), which during World War Two had established a network of journalists and psychological warfare experts operating primarily in the European theatre.

Many of the relationships forged under OSS auspices were carried over into the postwar era through a State Department-run organization called the Office of Policy Coordination (OPC) overseen by OSS staffer Frank Wisner.

The OPC “became the fastest-growing unit within the nascent CIA,” historian Lisa Pease observes, “rising in personnel from 302 in 1949 to 2,812 in 1952, along with 3,142 overseas contract personnel. In the same period, the budget rose from $4.7 million to $82 million.” Lisa Pease, “The Media and the Assassination,” in James DiEugenio and Lisa Pease,

The Assassinations: Probe Magazine on JFK, MLK, RFK and Malcolm X, Port Townsend, WA, 2003, 300.

Like many career CIA officers, eventual CIA Director/Director of Central Intelligence (DCI) Richard Helms was recruited out of the press corps by his own supervisor at the United Press International’s Berlin Bureau to join in the OSS’s fledgling “black propaganda” program. “‘[Y]ou’re a natural,” Helms’ boss remarked. Richard Helms, A Look Over My Shoulder: A Life in the Central Intelligence Agency, New York: Random House, 2003, 30-31.

cia disinformation

Wisner tapped Marshall Plan funds to pay for his division’s early exploits, money his branch referred to as “candy.” “We couldn’t spend it all,” CIA agent Gilbert Greenway recalls. “I remember once meeting with Wisner and the comptroller. My God, I said, how can we spend that? There were no limits, and nobody had to account for it. It was amazing.” Frances Stonor Saunders, The Cultural Cold War: The CIA and the World of Arts and Letters, New York: The New Press, 2000, 105.

When the OPC was merged with the Office of Special Operations in 1948 to create the CIA, OPC’s media assets were likewise absorbed.

Wisner maintained the top secret “Propaganda Assets Inventory,” better known as “Wisner’s Wurlitzer”—a virtual rolodex of over 800 news and information entities prepared to play whatever tune Wisner chose. “The network included journalists, columnists, book publishers, editors, entire organizations such as Radio Free Europe, and stringers across multiple news organizations.” Pease, “The Media and the Assassination,” 300.

A few years after Wisner’s operation was up-and-running he “’owned’ respected members of the New York Times, Newsweek, CBS, and other communication vehicles, plus stringers, four to six hundred in all, according to a CIA analyst. Each one was a separate ‘operation,’” investigative journalist Deborah Davis notes, “requiring a code name, a field supervisor, and a field office, at an annual cost of tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars—there has never been an accurate accounting.” Deborah Davis, Katharine the Great: Katharine Graham and the Washington Post, Second Edition, Bethesda MD: National Press Inc, 1987, 139.

Psychological operations in the form of journalism were perceived as necessary to influence and direct mass opinion, as well as elite perspectives. “[T]he President of the United States, the Secretary of State, Congressmen and even the Director of the CIA himself will read, believe, and be impressed by a report from Cy Sulzberger, Arnaud de Borchgrave, or Stewart Alsop when they don’t even bother to read a CIA report on the same subject,” noted CIA agent Miles Copeland. Cited in Pease, “The Media and the Assassination,” 301.

By the mid-to-late 1950s, Darrell Garwood points out, the Agency sought to limit criticism directed against covert activity and bypass congressional oversight or potential judicial interference by “infiltrat[ing] the groves of academia, the missionary corps, the editorial boards of influential journal and book publishers, and any other quarters where public attitudes could be effectively influenced.” Darrell Garwood, Under Cover: Thirty-Five Years of CIA Deception, New York: Grove Press, 1985, 250.

The CIA frequently intercedes in editorial decision-making. For example, when the Agency proceeded to wage an overthrow of the Arbenz regime in Guatemala in 1954, Allen and John Foster Dulles, President Eisenhower’s Secretary of State and CIA Director respectively, called upon New York Times publisher Arthur Hays Sulzberger to reassign reporter Sydney Gruson from Guatemala to Mexico City. Sulzberger thus placed Gruson in Mexico City with the rationale that some repercussions from the revolution might be felt in Mexico. Pease, “The Media and the Assassination,” 302.

Since the early 1950s the CIA “has secretly bankrolled numerous foreign press services, periodicals and newspapers—both English and foreign language—which provided excellent cover for CIA operatives,” Carl Bernstein reported in 1977. “One such publication was the Rome Daily American, forty percent of which was owned by the CIA until the 1970s.” Carl Bernstein, “The CIA and the Media,” Rolling Stone, October 20, 1977.
The CIA exercised informal liaisons with news media executives, in contrast to its relationships with salaried reporters and stringers, “who were much more subject to direction from the Agency” according to Bernstein. “A few executives—Arthur Hays Sulzberger of the New York Times among them—signed secrecy agreements.

MICHAEL HASTINGS WAR ON JOURNALISM OBAMA CIA CAR HACK

But such formal understandings were rare: relationships between Agency officials and media executives were usually social—’The P and Q Street axis in Georgetown,’ said one source. ‘You don’t tell William Paley to sign a piece of paper saying he won’t fink.’” Director of CBS William Paley’s personal “friendship with CIA Director Dulles is now known to have been one of the most influential and significant in the communications industry,” author Debora Davis explains. “He provided cover for CIA agents, supplied out-takes of news film, permitted the debriefing of reporters, and in many ways set the standard for the cooperation between the CIA and major broadcast companies which lasted until the mid-1970s.” Deborah Davis, Katharine the Great: Katharine Graham and the Washington Post, Second Edition, Bethesda MD: National Press Inc, 1987, 175.

Continue reading “A Little Bit of CIA in Every Tap”

Whether it “Wins in Court” or Not, Why it is Harmful to Target Conservatives for Censorship

August 14, 2018
Updated October 11, 2018

Occupy Democrats Parody

Those who previously defended Free Speech, and many who are still whining incessantly about “Free Press,” are now unabashedly advocating and celebrating every last bit of censorship of all but their own speech.

Obviously the emerging alternative media is a major threat to maintaining corporate media’s long enjoyed dominance in their own business of programming the public mind.  And, with the destruction of critical thinking, this collective brain was already trained very well to rely more on whatever “expert journalists” presented as “news,” than any critical analysis, thoughts or individual discernment of their own.

Continue reading “Whether it “Wins in Court” or Not, Why it is Harmful to Target Conservatives for Censorship”

The Leftist’s True Feelings on Free Speech

August 2, 2018
Updated August 7, 2018

Occupy Democrats Parody

Most of us remember the old Berkeley hippy’s attitudes on speech that would have them routinely recite sensible words like:

“I may not agree with you, but I’ll fight to the death for your right to say it!”

During those early years of America’s left, children were still taught and themselves might recite rhymes like:

“Sticks and stones may break my bones, but names will never hurt me!”

Continue reading “The Leftist’s True Feelings on Free Speech”

Social Media Gulags: #FBJAIL

August 1, 2018
Occupy Democrats Parody

An admin of our Facebook page was dabbling in a bit of debate in a closed group, and when the other party tapped out, he offered a cute little MEME accompanied with “OK, well have a nice #HUMPDAY!”

Nobody in this group would have been adequately thin skinned to take the innocent and silly MEME as some big offense, but apparently some FB staffer that must have won their job at Facebook through the old “drinking game” interview process featured on euphemistic view of Zucker’s history in The Network, had previously registered the “offending” MEME as “hate speech.”

So the FB thought policing automation kicked in and blocked the post, and presented a happy little notification to the same “hateful” originator. Screenshot_20180801-112740_Facebook
And of course that “hater” will be barred from posting, liking posts, commenting, wishing friends “Happy Birthdays,” sending or even responding to Private Messaging, administering and moderating his pages and debate groups for a period of no less than 30 days!  The prior 30 days were faithfully served out by having called a moron out as a “moron” in another closed group, and in this case the moron in question was adequately #TRIGGERED to submit a report to FB’s team of in-house #SJWs.

Why was THAT such a long time-out?  Well the same victim of “PC + Power” was treated to a 7 day sentence before that.  This one resulted from an “offense” of having posted a cute Seinfeld-style joke that was from several months prior to an earlier 3 day suspension.

facebook censored block on dixie chicks post 7 day freeze

So, after the prior 3 day jail matter, had he done nothing but praise Zuckerberg as the sacred lord of all that is right and righteous on the internet, the above land mine was already in the soil, making the next 7 day suspension a predetermined fate.

So, you might wonder what the 3 day #FBJAIL was all about.  In another debate group conversation, he had questioned the heterosexuality of AntiFa, by addressing them by the acronym for Fine American Gentlemen… (adding the “g” to the “Fa.”)

antifa gay

Now before the 3 day there was (as per the formula,) a one day sentence.  The inconvenience of a one day interruption didn’t make sufficient impression to even retrace the steps back to whatever fateful word choice, but if the suppressed memory can be retrieved, I’m sure it will be reported here in a future update.

With all this targeted harassment it’s a wonder how the #LIBTARDS wouldn’t be completely satisfied with Zuckerbergs efforts to censor conservative voices on a “platform” turned to “personal website.”  But obviously unhinged lunatics can never be appeased.

 

 

I suppose they believe that #JackolfTwitler still does a slightly better job of targeting conservatives for censorship to make things even more “fair” for the deeply libtarded with no arguments.

 

KRISTINA OWEN CENSOR TRUMP TWITLER3 JACKDORSEY OBAMA

©2018 Occupy Democrats Parody

ABC Finds Excuse to Bar Roseanne in a “Racist” Tweet!

May 29, 2018
Updated May 30, 2018

Occupy Democrats Parody

Roseanne Barr is not known for being all that soft spoken, and when she takes to Twitter, she has a unique ability to trigger lefties with shockers that might even have a few conservatives blushing!

Early this morning, Tuesday was no exception.

roseanne barr famous tweet vallery jarret

And of course the #LIARSOFTHELEFT #MSM cries “racism” in unison with the major ranks of the #RACISTDEMS that apparently believe “ape” is “a race.”
Continue reading “ABC Finds Excuse to Bar Roseanne in a “Racist” Tweet!”

ZuckFace and Twitler Aren’t Shy About Taking Sides

Occupy Democrats Parody
May 21, 2018

The left have been throwing very public temper tantrums over Social Media monopolies failure to do even more to target conservatives for censorship.  Zuckerberg was called to the hot-high-chair over an outrage for a 3rd party Cambridge Analytics and their completely legal use of a tiny slice of the data Obama’s 2012 campaign was basically handed by Facebook with accompanying statements that they would not do anything like that were it not for seeing Democrats as “on their side.”

And of course it doesn’t end there.  Our own Twitter page was completely removed with NO warning after apparently having engaged a rabid SJW Twitter employee in debate.

 

©2018 Occupy Democrats Parody