February 18, 2019 Updated February 22, 2019 Occupy Democrats Parody
As much propagandizing as is done in Hollywood film and television, a higher calling to prop up the failing messages of Party of Crime Democrats put Jussie Smollett under a new spotlight.
Whether Kamala Harris solicited or encouraged his big stunt to provide complicit legacy media propagandists fodder to rekindle their big push to vilify the MAGA Hat, she seems to have dropped her love of Smollett to the extent of forgetting her own TWEET that elevated Smollett to the level of a “Jussie Christ” who was suffering for the “sins” of the American MAGA.
We are left to speculate whether his award winning performance that has Washington Post “journalists” like Nana Efua Mumford were so desperate to believe might somehow connect to a larger plot of libel and defamation against good Americans.
Some speculate that Kamala’s empty headed “Anti-Lynching Bill” might be connected to this example of “fake noose.”
And of course we are all left to do some of our own wondering. For every fake “hate crime” that is detected, how many more of these sort of hoaxes succeed to promote the foundational big lie upon which the entire Democrat party house of cards is built?
Others take note of the Democrat’s reliance on “outsourcing” in setting the stage for such orchestrated events.
Well, of course complicit Liars of the Left media will circle the wagons, and before you know it, they’ll be on to the next big “hate crime” which may, or may not, be among the ones so easily recognized as “fake news.” Meanwhile, the “casting couch Senator,” Miss Kamala Harris, will have to dig for scraps to prop up her big virtue signal bill to “outlaw lynching.”
Pelosi leveraged her restored grip on gavel to “unvite” the President from the traditional State of the Union Address scheduled for January 29. In spite of statements to the contrary by Secret Service and Homeland Security, she asserted that the government shutdown might make securing the safety of the SOTU a unique challenge. She also invited the President to submit his address in writing!
The newly restored Speaker Pelosi had previously made clear her firm stand against her Constitutional responsibilities on border security when she dug in her heals with “not one penny” of budgeting for the Border Wall that had been promised by both parties since and before Ronald Reagan made his own deal with Democrat devils more than 3 decades ago.
Since then there’s been plenty of talk and even bills passed to fully fund border security measures inclusive of fencing. One such bill was passed as recently as 2006 under Bush and while Barrack was only known as Senator Obama.
And guess who quietly starved the fully authorized $50 Billion in a bill passed by both houses and signed by then President Bush? Of course it was Nancy Pelosi. Following the usual Democrat rules, their wins mean they apply power. America’s win means they play sneaky games with appropriations and a corrupted judiciary.
Now some of us have become wise to what’s really going on. In spite of dominant lip service to border security inclusive of profound words by then Senator Obama…
…duplicitous Democrats secretly had other plans that they were not yet prepared to reveal to the public.
You’ll notice that Pelosi openly uses language like “monitoring the border,” and the above cartoon couldn’t illustrate better what Americans are just starting to realize about what “monitor” actually means.
In addition to obvious votes after and before naturalization, the specific quality of “immigrants” Democrats fish for are largely unable to read or write in their own language, and thus, the perfect fodder for the style of campaigning done by Democrats to promote mass slavery under “Democratic Socialism” and worse.
Now that the pressure is on, Democrats can’t do much in the way of pretending to care about border security. And the firm resolve to sacrifice stability and security of an “open government” makes an underlying treason more apparent than ever.
It’s also increasingly obvious that the greatest fear of Democrats is that a barrier, whether “a wall” or “a fence” is not an issue of “immorality” nor some brand new expression of “fiscal conservatism” by Democrats. The real concern is that it will work in a way that removes their Party of Crime the access it needs to a commodity of ignorant foreign nationals.
Democrats have been long taking a collective dump on their traditional base of less informed middle class Americans, they simply need new dummies to fool.
Many don’t realize that, even without all the illegals they allow to vote, they have a class slaves addicted to social services that will fight in all kinds of ways, and by simply existing in quantities, a sanctuary State delivers a bigger total population which in turn lets them bully less populace States more effectively.
So even before they have their way with a long standing scheme to abolish the Electoral College, they become bigger States in the House of Representatives in raw number of seats! Again this applies whether the immigrants are naturalized as citizens or not.
Eventually they will bring enough to simply outnumber Americans and the Democratic aspects of our Constitutional Republic will be its undoing. And a long history of demographic games by Democrats already have us up against a ledge. As expected in this past election, Democrat Vote Fraud (inclusive of a new “ballot harvesting” trick, (as was signed into law by Governor Brown in California,) combined with activism of mind rotted teen voters would corrupt Congress. And so few are surprised by the many entertainments of what amounts to a circus of chimpanzees in Congress.
Fortunately Pelosi’s antics as Speaker and the unprecedented “unvite” to the President on his own State of the Union Address have already been outdone by the zoo keeper in the White House. One could hardly imagine how upsetting it would be to Pelosi miss the extravagance of public relations tour of Brussels, Egypt and Afghanistan. And Trump knew just how to share the burdens of the Government Shutdown with Pelosi. Here’s his amazing letter that gave smiles to most every good American while inducing fits of rage among the anti-American left.
As promised in an earlier writing about congress, we are in for some great entertainments. And our amazing President is sure doing his part to mitigate the sad aspects of a thoroughly corrupted Congress with a more appealing and beneficial bit of comedy.
The term “conspiracy theory” wasn’t used much prior the JFK assassination and coverup. The official narrative has, since been by materials recently declassified by President Trump, been fully debunked.
So questionable were the official “answers” of the day, a great number of Americans began doing their own independent search for clues via newspaper clippings, and other examples of independent research to supplement whatever might be read between the lines on the fraudulent Warren Commission Report. These were arguably the first significant group of American “conspiracy theorists.”
Originally the phrase meant pretty much what one would expect by taking the two words placed together for their own respective definitions. Conspiracy meaning simply that two or more individuals make some secret, and most often nefarious plans, and theory, meaning a hypothesis (initial presupposed notion,) that’s passed some measure of review and or testing for plausibility and congruency.
With the advent of the Internet, exploration that was once relegated to conversation with “crazy” uncles, or the odd ball friend that might “read too many books,” became a more common activity.
The Internet basically created a collective consciousness and allowed efficient delivery of little pieces held by individuals to others that either have their own to tie in, or those with sufficient curiosity and intelligence to connect some dots. And as one would expect, conspirators were starting to see their own schemes coming up in an increasingly common range of discussions.
While some, like Jay Rockefeller openly bemoaned a “down side” to the Internet, others apparently got to work on the task of shaming any who might do a little “too much” digging.
The details of their scheme to redirect focus away from the “wild notions” online and back to the highly regulated content that appears on their television are known to precious few. But what we do know is, within a few short decades, a completely neutral phrase “conspiracy theory” has come to mean “wild rubbish” to a vast majority of the world’s online population.
And of course the ad hominem “conspiracy theorist” wouldn’t be complete with easily recognizable accessories like the iconic “foil hat” which has become its own catch phrase to serve as an alternative to use interchangeably as a synonymous insult.
Hollywood certainly did their part by releasing a feature film starring Mel Gibson as “Conspiracy Theorist.” In this one the central character is basically portrayed as mentally ill for what’s presented as an autistic interest in solving big puzzles. And to make the movie watchable, just the one of countless wildly implausible theories turns out by happy accident to be a real discovery. And the script was carefully crafted to ensure this wouldn’t exonerate his “lifestyle,” as much as serving an example of the “broken clock” that might be right twice a day.
Hollywood cannot effectively propagandize without offer of entertainment, and that’s offered in the form of seeing how he and his new friend are in great and exciting jeopardy as the conspirators that didn’t like having their big secret unraveled come after the pair to see them silenced. But obviously the essential message of the film was that pursuit of “conspiracy theories” wasn’t an activity for all to exercise their brains and better understand their own world, but a mostly harmful expression of mental illness.
Now few want to believe that they are “brainwashed” by media, and so most are reluctant on an emotional level to believe that their mindset would be rewired by their weekend movie choices. Those with some knowledge of marketing, however, know that companies like Coca Cola will pay millions to have a few frames of film include their product on a table or in the hands of an actor or actress.
When you recognize the clear value of impressionability exploited by marketers, it should logically follow that the script and story carry a much higher tangible value to another sort of ideological “marketing.” So moviegoers should be well aware that there’s often a lot more thought that goes into a script than just sheer entertainment.
In real life, the big conspiracies of global control are hardly kept secret. But as long as a those who are “woke” to it are in a minority, the newly weaponized “conspiracy theory” insult can help keep awareness from spreading. And the programmed masses are all to eager to cover their ears as a child with “la la la, I’m not listening!” responses to anything that might register to them as “conspiracy theory!”
ARE “CONSPIRACY THEORIES” UNIVERSALLY UNWORTHY OF EXPLORATION?
If the appropriate mistrust of government as recommended by Thomas Jefferson makes one a “conspiracy theorist” then it ought to be worn as a badge of honor.
One might ask what kind of a mush head would think some government on Earth conducts business less any “conspiracies” and cover-ups? Are you that naive?
Should we honestly think folks maintain control over populations by full disclosure and true transparency? Do they really believe those in charge place public interest ahead of their own, and that there are no agendas pushed without first campaigning for public awareness and majority consent?
The anti-“conspiracy theory” crowd have been programmed to believe the smaller percentage of folks that read “too much”, pay closer attention, blow a few whistles and connect a few dots are the real problem. And so they’ve unwittingly become one of the Borg that’s been conditioned to decry any questioning at first listen on the basis that it registers as example of the ominous catch-all of “conspiracy theory!”
They’ve played into the game of keeping that “lively debate” within the permissible range of topics. And invariably, like the child that runs covering their ears, they place a hard barrier between themselves and discovering any truth as would result from the superior practice of following all leads.
Not all “conspiracy theories” are correct, nor are they all “incorrect.” And as long as there are groups of two or more that make plans that work better without full public disclosures, conspiracies happen. And as long as someone dares speculate what might lay beneath public disclosures, there will be “conspiracy theorists.”
Children of all ages will read mystery novels that are complete fiction. Many see it as a way to exercise their minds as they attempt to connect a few dots and solve a plot initially shrouded in secrecy. Why should they not take more interest in following the twists and turns of a scenario that might actually relate to the real world and the power structures that largely manage their lives? Only one of two things will happen. They’ll either find something to be more plausible than they might have expected, or they’ll learn enough to find flaws and possibly even debunk a bad one.
And knowing the details of a theory proven wrong puts them in a better position to help any “crazy” friends allay any ill placed concerns and focus on whatever else in their world is more real or at least plausible. Certainly this is more useful than solving a who-done-it fiction which still a brain-game but one that delivers no discernible new understandings.
One thing that is interesting, is the crowd of liberals that were so ready on the trigger to dismiss any “conspiracy theories” are now wearing their own best foil hats to promote the absurd #RUSSIANHACKING expression of #LIBTARDCONSPIRACYTHEORY which they believe fits well with all the dogma they embrace as part of their #DEMOCRATRELIGION.
It’s hard to find words to describe the kind of courage that Senator Richard Blumenthal must have to show up in D.C. after being called out for his insidious and ugly crime against the U.S. Military of stolen valor. But apparently “Fake Vet” Blumenthal aka “Da Nang Dick Head” has that form of “bravery” in great abundance.
Of course the Democrats are slow to make moves to have him ousted because he’s truly, in every regard, one of them. Without being a criminal fraud, liar, hypocrite and a lunatic, he really couldn’t call himself a Democrat.
December 6, 2018 Updated December 11, 2018 Occupy Democrats Parody
Before he was so well known as “journalist” Jamal Khashoggi was an activist that helped arrange the mass murder via Arab Spring and other Obama and Hillary cosponsored terror movements. It might almost be touching how all the liberals finally found a dead journalist they’re prepared to mourn in the form of overt and widely circulated outrage were it not so transparent as just another opportunity to take a collective crap on the President of the United States.
None of the lefties ever demonstrated much concern about Saudi Arabia while they were busy stoning “adulterous” pregnant women and performing public lynching of gays. And few ever questioned the Clintons’ nor Obamas’ cozy and even subservient relationship with those kings and princes Saudi Arabia.
Nor did they seem all that upset when the Obama and Hillary sponsored ISIL (Obama’s pet name for ISIS) performed a public and videotaped beheading of a prominent Jewish journalist.
And now when a new young Saudi Prince has apparently demonstrated interest in getting Saudi’s act together, and dropping a hammer on the worst and most vile of Wahibi Sunnis that threaten, bully and murder throughout the region, suddenly we’re to be all upset about poor Jamal.
And of course the PressWeCan media all cite the “intelligence agencies” as having “reliable evidence” that ties an unfortunate few moments at an Embassy to the Saudi government.
Well of course, and as usual, the leftists revel in every irony. And we’ve yet to hear any of those usual suspects utter so much as a peep over countless murdered journalists in Mexico, nor have they called for any “investigations” much less “sanctions.”
And of course they’re all equally unmoved by our own American journalists and whistle blowers that were apparently murdered by the CIA and Democrats.
Now I have no doubt that however bad the sins of Jamal’s past, few men, if any, really deserve to be ended in the cruel and clearly inhumane manner as were described in the reports concerning the late Khasshogi’s demise. The notion that this tragic death of an activist-terrorist-“journalist” amounts to a basis for reshaping our foreign diplomacy with a Saudi Arabia that’s just now, trying to be better ally, is more than just a little absurd, hypocritical and ironic. But of course without those three qualities, there wouldn’t be Democrats.
November 27, 2018 Updated December 6, 2018 Occupy Democrats Parody
There’s an important story behind the so-called “caravan” of “migrants” or “asylum seekers,” the complicit propagandists will have you believe are “escaping” to America for “a better life.”
This content doesn’t appear to be permitted on Youtube, so for now I’ll provide a link by Facebook. If anyone finds alternate links, please provide in the comments since I doubt it will last long on Zucker’s personal webpage previously known as “platform.”
I’ve not yet found a more concise presentation of facts and recommend you share this generously to any friends that embrace the massive lies being fed them by media propagandists about “mothers with babies, teargas,” are being “oppressed” by “racist and xenophobic” Americans.
Whereas even Democrats used to speak in strong and clear terms about the importance of immigration control…
…few politicians are keeping their own call for compliance to UN’s border busting activities any sort of secret.
Some evolutionary factors as to why women and estrogen poisoned men are motivated to invite invading armies is presented here. Google has this one all but banned from Youtube, so you actually have to click through a warning before you’re entitled to these facts:
While the villains that either exacerbated or arranged California’s fires exploit the horror they created to pitch “Climate Change” for their globalist masters, others are raising some rather more serious questions.
Perhaps it’s time to look into those Direct Energy Weapons patents and/or hardware and how they might account for at least a portion of the destruction in lives and property that appears to prove all too convenient well documented Agenda 21 directives.